Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Say What? Can Your Baby Hear You?

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Can Your Baby Hear You?

The birth of a healthy baby is a miracle. The child emerges with ten fingers and toes, perfectly formed to touch and kick in a big, new world. Nose and taste buds yearn for the first meeting with mother’s nutritious milk. A baby even opens its eyes trying to focus on the blurry faces of parents looming close, cooing their hellos and declarations of love.

Wait,” thinks one baby out of 1,000. “Something is missing. You’re cooing and kissing but I can’t hear a thing!?” Indeed, no adults seem to notice that in spite of all this activity, all is silent to the baby.

After the birth, our baby is pulled out of its mother’s warm and protective arms into the hands of a pediatrician for examination. Seemingly, with a fine tooth comb, he makes sure that all is complete and well, and that there are no defects or deficiencies to be addressed before the baby leaves the hospital. The physician looks into every opening, fold and crevice, tests the limb joints and reflexes, listens for the heartbeat and breathing, and almost always gives the delighted parents the clean bill of health, congratulations and the measuring tape with the baby’s length noted.

Why was this baby, and nearly 50% of all babies with later-discovered hearing loss, sent home from the hospital after delivery with undetected hearing loss? The reason is that hearing loss detection tests were not routinely performed on infants until recently, when Government sponsored universal screening programs were initiated for newborns.

Beauté de Maman Nipple Gel

Why is it important to identify infants with hearing loss?
The ability to detect hearing problems in newborn infants is crucial. Studies have shown that being able to process auditory information early in life is crucial for later development of reading and spoken language skills. Hearing loss is associated with social and emotional developmental lags in children as well as poor academic achievement.

What is the incidence of congenital hearing loss?
Congenital hearing loss can be found in two to three infants per 1,000 live births. That means that there are approximately 5,000 babies born in the United States each year with bilateral permanent hearing loss.

How do you define hearing loss in newborns?
Newborns are checked for moderate to severe bilateral permanent hearing loss. Current testing after birth does not pick up loss that is progressive or acquired later in life. The current testing programs detect hearing losses at a threshold of 30–40 dB in the frequency important for speech recognition (500–4,000 Hz)

What are the characteristics of children that are most likely to have hearing loss?
Babies who were determined to be at high risk for hearing loss include children that were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for more than 2 days, (1–2 cases of hearing loss for every 200 babies), premature infants, children with craniofacial anomalies, family history of hearing disorders, children whose mothers developed infections in utero, and children who are born with certain syndromes. However, it was found that close to half of all the children not in the high risk group were missed. Therefore, about 50% of all children with hearing problems were sent home from the hospital with undetected hearing loss.

What are the current state requirements to have children checked prior to leaving the hospital?
Currently in all 50 states, Guam, and the District of Columbia regulations direct testing of all children for hearing loss before leaving the hospital. All states and US territories have Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs funded by the Federal Government which delineate the screening protocols, follow-up care and collection of data. This data collection has been initiated only since the 1990’s. The US Department of Health and Human Services now has clear guidelines which include a universal protocol that screening should occur before 1 month of age, follow-up for infants not passing the test no later than 3 months of age and follow-up intervention prior to 6 months of age for infants identified with hearing loss. Due to initiation of these programs, the number of infants screened for hearing loss increased from 46.5% in 1999 to 97% in 2007.

What are some of the causes of hearing loss in infants?
Hearing loss can be divided into 4 categories:

  1. Central
    This is due to deafness caused by problems along the auditory pathway to the brain or in the brain.
    High levels of bilirubin (breakdown product of blood cells—often causing jaundice in the newborn.)
    Hypoxia (low oxygen levels)
    Intraventricular hemorrhage (bleeding within the brain.)
  2. Conductive
    This is caused by problems with the outer ear, middle ear, the tympanic membrane, or the bones of the ear and affects all frequencies equally. This may also be due to congenital cholesteatoma (growth in the middle ear.)
  3. Sensorineural
    This is caused by problems in the inner ear or auditory nerve. About 50% of these are due to various genetic diseases and syndromes (Alport’s Syndrome, Turner’s, Usher’s, Waardenburg’s syndrome). Scientists have now mapped genes that cause hereditary hearing loss, in families. In 20–30% of cases, sensorineural defects can also be due to infectious causes such as cytomegalovirus ( most common), group B strep infections, herpesvirus, rubella, toxoplasmosis, and syphilis. Mothers can acquire these infections during pregnancy and pass it to the fetus in utero. Children can show no signs at birth but go on to develop deafness later on in life. Unknown causes (idiopathic) and anatomic causes are also in this category.
  4. Mixed
    This includes a combination of the above etiologies.

What are the most common tests used for screening?
There are 2 infant tests available called the AABR and the TEOAE. Both diagnose sensorineural hearing loss in newborns. There is no evidence that one test is superior to the other to date, although some studies have shown a lower rate of false positives with AABR. Children with positive testing are referred for further testing and details are obtained about genetic and family history.

  1. Automated brainstem response (AABR)
    This checks the auditory pathway from the outside ear to the lower brainstem. Infants have their ears covered with earphones that emit a series of clicks. Electrodes on the infants forehead and neck measure brain wave activity in response to the clicks which is then fed into a computer that assess the brain wave activity.
  2. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE)
    This test evaluates the function of the cochlea by placing a small microphone in the external ear canal and testing the echo responses to a series of clicks which is then placed thru a computer and compared to the standard.

With any kind of testing, the important issue is the false positive and false negative rates. Universal newborn screening has a high number of false positive rates, mostly due to motion artifacts. Other causes of false positives can be due to fluid in the ear or ear infections. False positive rates can be as high as 30% with a one step test, to less than 1% if a child is tested twice. If a child fails the test twice, an ear, nose, and throat referral is directed by the pediatrician.

Proper counseling of the parents allays the anxiety caused by false positives. The overall benefit far outweighs the risks of missing a potentially deaf child with delayed intervention.

What are the future goals to improve the medical care of infants with hearing loss?
Future goals include devising a system for providing better follow-up care on children who do not pass the initial screening and for screening children that fall below the threshold and have milder forms of hearing loss or late onset and progressive forms of hearing loss that can be missed. Also, ensuring that children with documented disorders are enrolled in intervention programs is critical. Children that have risk factors should not only be screened at birth but again throughout childhood.

Recommendations by the Joint Committee on Infant hearing recommends testing every 6 months before 3 years of age in high risk children. More Federal programs are being initiated to track follow-up care on infants and to increase education and awareness.

Summary:
Hearing loss detection in infants has markedly changed in the last decade, with over 95% of all newborns being screened. Follow-up interventions and enrollment in programs still remain a challenge. The Federal programs now in place, with universal testing and better data collation and tracking systems, are expected to bring vast changes. Improvements in overall quality of life will occur as a result of earlier detection and treatment as children avoid limitations in speech, language, and cognitive capacity. Hopefully this will obviate the damage caused by hearing limitations that affect academic performance, social interaction and deficits that negatively impact ability to work.

Please feel free to leave your experiences, or questions, regarding hearing loss in infants in the comments section below. I would enjoy hearing from you.

Best Regards,
Dr. Michele Brown OB/GYN

And don’t forget to check out our natural and herbal products for pregnant women.

Cesarean on Demand

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Birth of Julius Caesar. Unknown artist. British Library

My mothers-to-be are astonishingly different from one another as they arrive ready to give birth in all possible shapes, sizes, and stages of delivery. Yet, in another way, they are mostly of one mind… determined to do anything medically necessary for the well-being of their baby.

Fortunately, the majority of births are pleasantly routine and everyone goes home a bit sore, but happy, healthy and determined to be a successful family. Once in a while, a delivery that may seem quite routine at first, can suddenly become complicated for any number of reasons. If the problems become overwhelming, the OB/GYN will strongly suggest that the parents give their consent for delivery via cesarian section, commonly known as a C-section.

This decision should not be suggested lightly because, after all, it’s surgery! Only after the OB/GYN deems that the risks of a C-section are lower than the risks of a vaginal delivery should the C-Section option be chosen. Safety for the mother and baby always come first and only the physician is trained to know when this procedure is medically necessary. In rare cases, parents may be told ahead of labor that a C-section will be medically necessary, (i.e. if the child did not turn around in the womb). This is not considered elective because the need for surgery is decided in advance.

After delivering more than 3,000 babies, I thought I had heard it all! That is until quite recently when we OB/GYNs began hearing a more puzzling kind of medical request—and began hearing it more and more often.

A case history
B.P. is a 40 year old professor of obstetrics from a major university hospital who is admitted to labor and delivery at term contracting every 5 minutes for the last hour. This is her first child—having been conceived through in-vitro fertilization. She is a healthy woman with no medical problems, has had a completely uneventful pregnancy with all routine prenatal testing showing normal results, appropriate fetal growth, adequate amniotic fluid, baby in a perfect head down position, and a recent ultrasound estimating the baby to weigh approximately 7 pounds. On admission to the delivery floor she requests an elective cesarean section.

It has been established that an individual has the right to refuse medical procedures, but does it also follow that a person has the right to demand a medically unnecessary treatment?

C-section Trends
Obstetrical care throughout the world is undergoing dramatic changes. Cesarean deliveries are increasing to the extent that in some countries, such as China and parts of Latin America it is well over 50%. There have always been certain traditional reasons for performing a cesarean section but recently “maternal request” has been added as a new indication. The rate of elective cesareans in the United States is now estimated to be between 4 % and 18%.

Reasons for elective C-sections

Fear of labor—(tocophobia)
Some women have a fear of pain, fear of an emergency and/or having to undergo a traumatic experience involving higher morbidity and mortality associated with complications.

Maternal convenience
Scheduling takes into account childcare, work concerns, support systems, choice of surgeon.

Prevention of maternal floor damage
Concerns about urinary or bowel injury or future sexual functioning resulting from traumatic vaginal delivery.

“Designer Baby”
Expensive reproductive technology needed for conception and the need to deliver in the least traumatic way to avoid any risk to the child.

Neonatal benefits
Elective cesarean is associated with lower newborn infection rates, lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage, neonatal asphyxia, and encephalopathy.

Prevention of any birth asphyxia or potential birth trauma
Avoidance of injury such as bone fracture, nerve injury.

Prevention of stillbirth
The need for preventing a stillbirth or overdue pregnancy with the inherent associated risks.

Sterilization
Doing a cesarean can allow for a subsequent sterilization procedure in some countries where reproductive rights are not available to women on request.

As obstetricians, we are faced with a difficult situation. Should a mentally competent patient have the right to choose, ethically, how they would like their baby delivered? While patients have the ability to make personal choices in many other areas of medicine, clearly this can not apply to obstetrics. Why? Because the lives of not one, but two humans, are at stake.

Are there viable disadvantages to an elective C-section?
Surgery always poses additional risk factors. Elective cesarean section has a 2.84 fold greater risk of a woman’s death than a vaginal birth.

Added risks include:

  1. Maternal morbidity
    This includes surgical injury such as damage to other organs, risk of hemorrhage, hysterectomy, infection, fever due to other causes, hematoma, anesthetic complications, and blood clots.
  2. Respiratory issues in the newborn
    Transient tachypnea (rapid breathing) of the newborn occurs more frequently after elective cesarean and respiratory distress more likely if the surgery is booked prior to 39 weeks.
  3. Potential complications with future pregnancies
    This includes increased risk of uterine rupture if laboring during a subsequent pregnancy if you have a uterine scar from a previous cesarean, increased risk of placenta previa (low lying placenta adhering to the scar), placenta accreta (placenta growing into a previous uterine scar), and placental abruption (separation of the placenta from the uterine wall).
  4. Complications from adhesions
    Surgery can lead to abdominal adhesions which might effect future fertility, causing chronic pelvic pain, increase risk to bowel and bladder in future abdominal surgeries,and higher risk of ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages.
  5. Injury to the baby
    There is a 1.9% chance that a surgeons knife can accidentally lacerate the fetus when doing a cesarean. However, emergency cesarean sections after labor has a greater incidence of lacerations compared to elective cesareans.

What is the answer?
In today’s day and age, is it acceptable practice to allow the patient to determine the medical decision, assuming she is competent and well informed of any additional risks she is placing on herself? (i.e. informed consent) Could a physician be at risk for denying a patient’s request for a cesarean if, postpartum, the procedure results in injury to herself, or her child, immediately or several years down the road?

It behooves the obstetrician, or midwife, to weigh all the risks and benefits of providing this option after exploring the reasons for the request. The ethics committee of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) states “Only the woman can decide if the benefits to her of a procedure are worth the risks and discomfort she may undergo.” We must respect the rights and autonomy of a mother. However, “performing cesarean section for non-medical reasons is not ethically justified.”

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, however, feels that after exploring the request and proper counseling with informed consent, the physician can comply with the patients request if it is felt that cesarean will promote the overall health of the patient and the fetus more than a vaginal delivery.

This ethical controversy will continue to plague us, especially with health care costs spiraling. Having patients elect to have more expensive procedures, can threaten the solvency of the larger community. Why? Because a C-section requires not only a surgeon and an assistant, but an anesthesiologist, additional nursing, added supplies, equipment, an operating room, possibly blood for transfusion and longer hospitalization stays for both mom and baby.

We must ask ourselves if it makes sense to utilize the valuable time of medical professionals, as well as the financial resources of a community, in order to accommodate a woman’s desire to have the more expensive, and luxurious, C-section delivery?

Does respect for the rights of an individual outweigh the allocation of resources within a community? Right now, I personally don’t have the answer. I just want all my babies and mothers to leave happy and healthy.

Please let me know your thoughts below. I would be very happy to hear your opinion or to answer your questions regarding C-sections.

And don’t forget to check out our natural and herbal products for pregnant women.

Look What the Cat Dragged In…

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Cat and PregnancyHey, all you pet lovers out there. This article is not to frighten you away from having a cat or two, but nowhere is the expression “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” more applicable than when one discusses toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. This blog is intended to be a red alert for pregnant women on how to reduce the chances of having their baby acquire congenital toxoplasmosis.

Why? Because toxoplasmosis is a devastating disease for the fetus and the newborn throughout the world. It often goes completely unrecognized but can be prevented with the proper precautions. Roughly 400 to 4,000 cases occur per year in the United States. Women are routinely tested in high risk countries like France, Austria, and Italy but the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology does NOT routinely recommend screening in the United States.

Therefore, it is essential that all obstetricians take careful histories from their pregnant patients to determine if they are likely to have acquired this disease. If the patient clears the toxoplasmosis screening, the physician should further instruct  specific rules the pregnant woman should follow to avoid getting infected.

What is toxoplasmosis?
Toxoplasmosis is caused by ingestion of cysts from the protozoan Toxoplasmosis gondii. The primary host of the parasite is cats which excrete the oocyte in the feces. Humans become infected by eating raw or undercooked meats containing the oocyte, ingesting oocytes from soil where unwashed fruits and vegetables have grown, or from contact with cat litter. The oocytes can remain infectious after being deposited for over 1 year. After ingestion of the oocytes, infection can occur between 4 and 21 days.

What happens after the oocytes are ingested?
The protozoan after ingestion will invade muscle, heart, liver, spleen, lymph nodes, and the central nervous system. This can result in inflammation and cell death. Most normal adults with no immune problems go without symptoms and the disease is self limited. Occasionally one will have fever, swollen lymph nodes, and fatigue. If a woman is infected prior to pregnancy (greater than 6 months), transmission generally does not occur to the fetus except when her infection becomes reactivated due to a change in her immune status. (taking steroids, or she develops AIDS).

Are there special risks with pregnancy?
If a woman is pregnant and acquires the disease, the protozoan can travel through the placenta and infect the fetus resulting in mental retardation, seizures, malformations, blindness, deafness, and death. There is a classic triad of chorioretinitis (inflammation of the choroid and the retina of the eye), calcifications within the brain, and hydrocephalus (fluid accumulation within the brain) that occurs in less than 10% of cases.

Many infected newborns have no symptoms at birth (70–90%) and manifestations may not occur until the second or third decade of life where one can see learning and visual disabilities, retinal damage and loss of vision. Some infants do show signs of infection at birth with fever, enlargement of the liver and spleen, and rash. Other cases are suspected when ultrasound findings reveal the presence of structural abnormalities. Risk of the fetus acquiring the infection is lowest when maternal infection occurs first trimester and highest when infection occurs third trimester. However, infection tends to be worse if it occurs first trimester.

How is the infection detected and treated?
Infection is detected by a blood test that picks up antibodies to the protozoan (IgG and IgM). Using the results from these antibody tests, one can determine if an infection was never present, acquired before the pregnancy, or contracted during the pregnancy. Amniocentesis can also be performed to detect fetal infection. The earlier the blood test is obtained, the more helpful it will be in determining the timing of an infection. Treatment is with spiramycin early in the pregnancy or after 18 weeks with pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine and folinic acid since this crosses the placenta more readily. It is recommended that infected newborns should receive treatment, regardless of symptoms for up to a year since it is felt that treatment may improve the outcome.

Summary:

  1. Obstetricians must inquire from all their pregnant women on their initial prenatal visit if they own cats. Do not purchase a new cat or pet stray cats when pregnant. Cats should be fed cooked meat and kept indoors to prevent them from acquiring toxoplasmosis. Pregnant women should avoid changing the litter box. If it is completely unavoidable, gloves should be worn and the litter box should be changed daily.
  2. Gloves should be worn when gardening or when a pregnant woman has any contact with soil or sand.
  3. Pregnant women should avoid eating uncooked meat. Meats that are smoked, cured in brine, or dried can still be infectious. Wild game and venison are especially high in oocytes from toxoplasmosis. Spores are very resistant to environmental conditions except when heated to 55–60 degrees C for 1 to 2 min or when deep freezing meat (-12 degrees C or lower). All fruits and vegetables should be thoroughly washed before eating to prevent cross contamination from other foods or soil. Do not drink unpasteurized milk. Drinking unfiltered water or when rain and surface water lands into drinking water and irrigation water, infection can occur.
  4. Screening should be done in high risk women to decrease the incidence and severity of congenital toxoplasmosis by identifying the disease early and initiating treatment in an infected woman.
  5. Public health measures may have to be instituted in high risk communities around the world necessitating the filtering of water, testing and labeling meat as being toxoplasmosis free and improving farm hygiene.

Please feel free to post any questions you may have below. I would love to help prevent this disease from happening to any family looking forward to a new baby in the home.

Hemorrhoids: Harmless Yet Horrible

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Today’s pregnancy health topic is a bit delicate, but we have never been shy about discussing important health issues for pregnant women and we won’t tip-toe around hemorrhoids either. Fortunately there is nothing life threatening about hemorrhoids, but don’t tell that to a pregnant woman who has developed symptoms. You may be risking a bloody nose.

The problem is two fold in that many women are embarrassed to admit, even to their doctor, that they have excruciating pain “down there”. But pregnancy can exacerbate an existing condition or cause hemorrhoids to appear for the first time. Approximately 40% of pregnant women develop hemorrhoids but only 10% require some form of therapy. They are more common in the second and third trimester of pregnancy, more common in women who have been pregnant several times and increase in severity with each subsequent pregnancy.

What Are Hemorrhoids?

Hemorrhoids, also known as piles, are a conglomeration of swollen blood vessels in and around the anus and lower rectum.

Hemorrhoids can be classified into two kinds, internal and external. Internal hemorrhoids lie inside the anus or lower rectum, beneath the anal or rectal lining. Internal hemorrhoids generally present with bleeding and discomfort due to prolapse. External hemorrhoids lie outside the anal opening and present with irritation and discomfort. Both kinds can be present at the same time.

Hemorrhoids are a very common medical complaint. More than 75% of Americans have hemorrhoids at some point in their lives, typically after age 30.

What Causes Hemorrhoids?

The causes of hemorrhoidal disease are similar to those which cause varicose veins, i.e., genetic weakness of the veins, excessive venous pressure, low fiber diets (associated with constipation and increase straining), prolonged standing or sitting, and heavy lifting are considered factors.

The physical and hormonal changes associated with pregnancy tend to make women more prone to develop hemorrhoids or worsen existing hemorrhoidal symptoms.
Those changes include:

  • Increased abdominal pressure caused by the pregnant uterus.
  • Straining at defecation and constipation often accompanying pregnancy.
  • Dilation and engorgement of the veins due to increased blood volume.
  • Hormonal changes leading to increased laxity of connective tissue.

Symptoms

The symptoms most often associated with hemorrhoids include itching, burning, pain, inflammation, irritation, swelling, bleeding and seepage. Itching is often due to the mucous discharge from prolapsing internal hemorrhoids.

Pain does not occur unless there is acute inflammation of external hemorrhoids. As there are no sensory nerves ending above the anorectal line, uncomplicated internal hemorrhoids rarely cause pain.

Bleeding is almost always associated with internal hemorrhoids and may occur before, during or after excretion. When bleeding occurs from an external hemorrhoid, it is due to rupture of an acute thrombotic hemorrhoid. Bleeding hemorrhoids can produce severe anemia due to chronic blood loss.

Therapy

As with all diseases, the primary treatment of hemorrhoids is prevention. This involves reducing those factors which may be responsible for increasing pelvic congestion such as straining during defecation, and sitting or standing for prolonged periods or time.

A high-fiber diet is crucial for the maintenance of proper bowel activity. Spicy foods should be avoided.

Specific treatment of hemorrhoids should be tailored to the severity of the symptoms. In pregnancy special consideration should be made to the developing fetus. Drugs should therefore be used sparingly and surgery only done when absolutely necessary.

Dietary factors

Hemorrhoids are rarely seen in countries where high fiber, unrefined diets are consumed. A low fiber diet, high in refined foods, contributes greatly to the development of hemorrhoids.

Individuals consuming a low fiber diet tend to strain more during bowel movements since their smaller and harder stools are difficult to pass. This straining increases the pressure in the abdomen, which obstructs venous return. The increased pressure will increase pelvic congestion and may significantly weaken the veins, causing hemorrhoids to form.

A high fiber diet is perhaps the most important component in the prevention of hemorrhoids. Diets rich in vegetables, fruits, and legumes help keep the feces soft and easy to pass. The net effect of a high fiber diet is significantly less straining during defecation.

Bulking agents

Natural bulking compounds can be used to reduce fecal straining. They are the first basic step in your preventative strategy. These fibrous substances, particularly Psyllium seed, possess mild laxative action due to their ability to attract water and form a gelatinous mass.

Hydrotherapy

The warm sitz bath is an effective non-invasive treatment for uncomplicated hemorrhoids. A sitz bath is a partial immersion bath of the pelvic region. The Temperature of the water in the warm sitz bath should be 100–104 °F.

Topical therapy

Topical therapy, in most circumstances, will only provide temporary relief. Topical treatment involves the use of suppositories, ointments and anorectal pads. Many over the counter products for hemorrhoids contain primarily natural ingredients, such as witch hazel, shark liver oil, cod oil, cocoa butter, Peruvian balsam, zinc oxide, live yeast cell derivative and allantoin.

Surgical Intervention

In severe cases where conservative therapy was unsuccessful, consideration should be given to surgical treatment. These patients should consult a colorectal surgeon to determine the procedure of choice. Procedures such as elastic band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, (5% phenol in almond oil) and infrared photocoagulation have been performed successfully in pregnancy. Infection and bleeding in the peri-anal area is the major risk factor. Surgical hemorrhoidectomy has been performed in pregnancy successfully in severe cases where office based procedures have failed. Some patients have required further therapy postpartum.

In summary:

Hemorrhoids are a common problem during pregnancy. Treatment should focus on prevention and particularly high fiber diet and proper hydration.

When conservative measures fail, consulting a colorectal surgeon and discussing surgical options may be indicated.

Huh? Pregnancy Can Save Me from Cardiovascular Disease?

Monday, April 12th, 2010

The following article is about preeclampsia and heart disease, a topic I’ve wanted to write about several times in the past, but never did. I honestly believed it would be too difficult to explain in terms understood by those who did not have a technical or health related background.

Oh boy, was I wrong! From all the emails and comments I’ve received, I’ve concluded that not only do my readers understand the more difficult topics I have written about, but many of you are asking questions I’m having a hard time answering without science journals by my side. Allow me to give you a round of applause for your tremendous effort to be the healthiest you can be, not just for yourself, but also for your unborn child. You are to be commended.

Back to Preeclampsia
Also known as toxemia, preeclampsia presents as high blood pressure due to the narrowing of the blood vessels, high protein levels in the urine, and the swelling of arms, legs, fingers and toes. It can begin sometime after the 20th week of pregnancy.

The purpose of this week’s blog is not to discuss treatment of preeclampsia. Rather I will discuss the type of woman who is susceptible to preeclampsia and the implication that it may be an indicator for specific health problems (such as cardiovascular disease) down the road. Why is this important to know? Because preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and newborn illness and mortality and it is estimated that 2–4% of all pregnancies result in the condition. This is not something we can ignore.

Is there a relationship between preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease?
The cause of preeclampsia is still unknown, but doctors will worry when they see inflammation in the body, clotting problems, and metabolic changes in various organ systems such as the liver, lung, and kidneys. It has been observed that there are lesions in the placenta, such as fibrin deposits, damaged placental vessels (athetosis), and clots (thrombosis) that are similar to those seen by heart specialists in their cardiovascular disease patients.

The mysterious connection begins with the fact that both preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease are associated with unfavorable levels of fats in the blood, (lipid profiles which measure the level of cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood). Researchers have also noticed that both preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease present with high insulin levels, high systolic and diastolic blood pressures, high BMI (body/mass index), elevated sugar levels, low HDL cholesterol, high triglycerides, and excessive activation of the clotting system. All these similarities have led to the belief that there must be similar mechanisms at work between the two disorders.

Are there changes before a woman becomes pregnant that would make her more prone towards developing toxemia?
It is believed that certain women have inherited genetic abnormalities which predisposes them to toxemia when they become pregnant. This “metabolic syndrome” is defined as the presence of 3 or more of the 5 risk factors which include:

  • abdominal obesity
  • elevated blood pressure,
  • elevated triglycerides,
  • elevated high density lipoprotein,
  • and elevation in fasting glucose levels or insulin resistance which often is present before any pregnancy.

When some, or all, of these conditions exist, pregnancy may trigger the factors that lead to toxemia.

Most common pre-pregnancy risk factors associated with induced toxemia.

  1. Polycystic ovary
  2. Increased testosterone
  3. Obesity and increased BMI
  4. Greater waist circumference
  5. Hypertension (5–10% of pregnancies)
  6. Increased homocysteine levels
  7. Increased Insulin resistance
  8. Diabetes
  9. Lipid abnormalities (high cholesterol)
  10. Thrombophilias (disorders of coagulation)
  11. Genetic history of preeclampsia.

Are women who develop preeclampsia at higher risk of developing heart disease later in life?
It has been written that women with preeclampsia are at higher risk for the development of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, venous thrombosis, and hemorrhagic stroke later on in life. In fact, women with preeclampsia who delivered early or with infants with intrauterine growth retardation, have an eightfold higher risk of death from cardiovascular disease or ischemic heart disease as compared to women with normal pregnancies. When delivering at the end of  normal term, women had a 1.65 fold increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease if they had preeclampsia during their first pregnancy. What is this telling us? It says that there is a strong association between an infants birth weight and the mother’s mortality from heart disease.

Women with preeclampsia continue to show many of the same metabolic changes including insulin resistance (need for more insulin after you eat a sugar load) along with higher blood pressure, higher BMI (body/mass ratio) and higher lipid profiles when they are no longer pregnant. Later on in life this will predispose to atherosclerosis which will become cardiovascular disease.

Summary:
Women with preeclampsia may be at future risk for the development of heart disease. There are similar genetic and environmental risk factors for the two diseases and similar abnormalities between the two disorders. It has been suggested that women who develop toxemia should undergo screening starting at 1 year after they give birth. These women should be followed post pregnancy and offered treatment for any of the mentioned risk factors to prevent the risks of illness and death associated with heart disease. Treatment can include dietary changes, exercise, antioxidant therapy, blood pressure medications if indicated, and blood cholesterol screening and medications if needed.

If you have had preeclampsia in your pregnancy, get checked out every year following the birth of your baby. Early intervention could save your life at a time when you will certainly want to be enjoying your family.

Weight Until You Read This!

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

It’s your prenatal check up day and everything is fine until the OBGYN’s assistant requests that you “jump” on the scale. You cover your eyes and try not to look at the numbers, but you know the lecture is coming. You know you have gained too much even though you are pregnant and are supposed to gain weight. It’s just not fair! Why are they harassing you over a few pounds?

This is why. The obesity epidemic in the United States, affecting males and females, all ages, and all ethnic groups has reached astronomic proportions in the last twenty years. It has been estimated that nearly two-thirds of adults are overweight and at least one-third of those are obese.

In pregnancy, being overweight or obese is especially concerning because of the increased association with pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes. BMI (body mass index) calculated from a persons weight and height is the value used to describe a personʼs fat distribution. Increased pregnancy risks are associated both with higher maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and also change in BMI category during the pregnancy. Being overweight or obese during pregnancy can also set the pattern to the development of obesity in midlife with all the added risks.

The guidelines that were established for gestational weight gain by the Institute of Medicine in 1990, specify that normal weight women (19.8–26.0 kg/m2) should gain 25–35 pounds during their pregnancy. Overweight is defined as weight (kg)/height squared (m) or BMI of 25 to 29.9 and obesity is BMI over 30. Studies have shown that more than half of all pregnant women donʼt fall within the current IOM guidelines and are therefore increasing their risks of complications both during and after their pregnancy.

What are some of the risks in pregnant obese women?

  • gestational diabetes
  • preterm delivery
  • preeclampsia
  • eclampsia
  • infections-wound, endometritis, and chorioamnionitis
  • cephalopelvic disproportion or failure to progress in labor
  • lacerations
  • operative vaginal delivery (forceps)
  • cesarean section
  • failed induction
  • 2 to 3 fold increased risk of being overweight in midlife with the numerous chronic health problems (heart disease, hypertension, diabetes,stroke,gallbladder disease,certain cancers,osteoarthritis, dyslipidemia)

What are some of the risks to the offspring in pregnant obese women?

  • birth defects
  • low 5 minute apgar scores
  • need for resuscitation at birth
  • stillbirth
  • macrosomia (greater than 4000 grams)
  • hypoglycemia
  • childhood obesity
  • longer nursery stays
  • risk of late fetal death
  • 2 fold increased risk of death within the first year of life

Summary:

Interventions to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnancy may have to begin prior to a woman conceiving. The importance of educating a woman during her pregnancy about appropriate weight gain and the clinical implications of changing BMI status during pregnancy is paramount because of the association with poor gestational outcomes. Close monitoring of BMI with charting during pregnancy and added dietary counseling from health care providers for women exceeding the guidelines could help reduce perinatal mortality. Adhering to the Institute of Medicine guidelines results in lower perinatal risks. Women who fail to lose weight after their pregnancy are more prone to weight issues and higher BMIʼs in midlife.

IOM PREGNANCY GUIDELINES

IOM CLASSIFICATION OF
PRE-PREGNANCY BMI
IOM RECOMMENDED
WT GAIN (LBS)
<19.8 (low) 28–40
19.8–26.0 (normal) 25–35
26.1–29.0 (high) 15–25
29.0 (obese) At least 15 pounds
So, now you know why weight gain must be controlled during pregnancy and why you should reach for apples instead of the cookies. Stay tuned for an upcoming blog from a renowned nutritionist who will help you divert your cravings into healthy eating.

Vaccinate Mom. Save the Baby.

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

My job as an OBGYN is to help make a woman’s pregnancy, and her baby’s birth, as smooth and wondrous as possible. This update may help you understand what to do about vaccinations during pregnancy and why your OBGYN will want you to be completely protected in order to protect your baby.

As a form of protection from acquiring certain serious diseases, women should be vaccinated. Unfortunately, pregnancy poses a special risk from vaccination because a developing fetus could acquire disease from a live virus or bacteria contained within the vaccine itself. It could result in a congenital birth defect. Therefore, only inactivated vaccines or vaccines containing toxoids (bacterial toxins that have been chemically altered) are generally recommended and administered during pregnancy. These immunizations are recommended when the risk of infection is high and when the vaccine is not live.

Recently, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology released a new statement regarding the administration of Tdap, (pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria) for pregnant and postpartum women and their infants.

Their recommendations are as follows:

  1. Pregnant women who were NOT previously vaccinated with Tdap should receive the vaccine upon discharge from the hospital after delivery.
  2. All pregnant women should receive Tdap in the IMMEDIATE postpartum period before discharge from the hospital if the previous vaccination was greater than 2 years ago.
  3. The safety and efficacy of the pertussis vaccine has not been demonstrated in pregnancy and therefore it is not routinely recommended, except in the rare instance of a community outbreak. However, in cases where it was inadvertently given, there was no increased morbidity or mortality.
  4. All women thinking of becoming pregnant should be vaccinated.
  5. Adults and others in a household who anticipate contact with an infant less than 12 months old, are recommended to receive the vaccine.

In other words, get the vaccine, before you get pregnant if possible. If not possible get the vaccine after the baby is born and right before you leave the hospital.

What is pertussis?

Pertussis, or whooping cough, is a bacterial infection of the respiratory system caused by the organism Bordetella pertussis. The bacteria produces many toxins which damage respiratory epithelium and mucosal cells. Parents, and in particular new mothers, are a major source of infection for infants that are less than 12 months old. Unfortunately, this is also the age when fatalities are highest.

  1. Pertussis disease can range from a mild infection with no symptoms, to a prolonged severe illness sometimes lasting up to 6 months.
  2. Petussis is highly contagious, attacking 80 to 100% of individuals in a household that are not immunized.
  3. Pertussis is transmitted from person to person by coughing or sneezing.
  4. Pertussis in pregnancy is no more severe than for a non-pregnant woman.
  5. Most cases of pertussis present with spasms of whooping-like coughing, choking, post-cough vomiting and incontinence.
  6. Risks to the unborn child are relatively rare with no relationship to malformations in fetal development.
  7. Disease in adolescents and adults is marked by a prolonged coughing illness.

The biggest risk in pertussis is for infants that are less than 12 months old, especially within the first 6 months of birth. Complications, including death, are often due to coincident pneumonia that can involve other bacteria and viruses, and pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure). Almost all infant deaths have occurred among unvaccinated infants.

Due to this fact, it is believed that vaccination of 90% of household contacts (children, adolescents, and adults) could prevent 75% of pertussis cases among infants between the ages of 0 and 23 months. In addition, vaccination of health care workers can prevent outbreaks in maternity wards, prenatal clinics ,and the nurseries in hospitals.

What is the incidence of pertussis?

The number of reported cases of pertussis has been increasing each year. There are worldwide cyclic outbreaks every 3–5 years. It is more frequent in the summer and autumn. Approximately 600,000 cases are reported each year in the United States and many milder forms are not reported. The majority of deaths occur within the first 3 months of life.

What is the treatment for pertussis?

A pregnant woman near term with documented pertussis can infect her child. Therefore, treatment with antibacterial agents and prophylaxis are essential in prevention of the newborn acquiring the infection. All members of the household including the newborn should be treated along with the infected person to prevent transmission to the newborn. Examples of antibiotics which are safe in pregnancy include erythromycin, azithromycin, or clarithromycin. For newborns, azithromycin is the preferred drug for newborns because of fewer side effects. Cough suppressants are generally not effective.

What is the latest information on the pertussis vaccine?

The pertussis vaccine’s protection lasts from 5 to 10 years. After this period of time people are again susceptible to the infection. The most common side effects from the vaccine include pain from the injection site, swelling and redness, headache, fatigue, and fever.

In summary:

Pertussis is a major cause of infant mortality and morbidity.

The CDC Advisory committee recommends routine vaccination for postpartum women before leaving the hospital, if they were not vaccinated in the past and have not been vaccinated in the last 2 years, in order to provide protection and prevent transmission of pertussis to their newborns.

Find out about our Beauté de Maman Nipple Gel WITHOUT LANOLIN!

Try Beauté de Maman Stretch Mark Cream.

Reduce Baby Allergies Before Delivery?

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Oh Maybe, My Baby

Parents are persistent in asking their obstetricians, “Is there anything we can do when pregnant or breastfeeding to try and prevent allergies from occurring in our child? Why? Because Parents worldwide are noticing that the incidence of allergy, or atopy, in children is dramatically increasing. This includes asthma, allergic rhinitis (runny nose due to allergy), skin allergies (eczema), and food allergies.

Why is this increase in childhood allergies occurring and are there any nutritional options during pregnancy and lactation which will help prevent allergic disease?

In order to understand what to do, parents must first understand the severity and scope of the problem. This is what my research has uncovered.

What is the incidence of atopy (different allergies) in children?

It is estimated that 5-10% of children suffer from food allergies. Peanut allergy in particular is a growing public health problem effecting 1% of all British and US preschool children. The incidence has doubled in the past decade. Asthma incidence in the U.S. has increased 160% in children up to 4 years of age. Eczema is estimated to effect 10-20% of school age children and has increased 2 to 3 fold.

What causes atopic disease?

Atopic disease has a genetic basis but environmental factors, such as early nutrition, may also play an important role. Food allergy, eczema, and asthma are more likely to occur in infants with a family history of allergy in one or more first degree relatives. Chicken eggs, cow milk, peanuts, fish, nuts, wheat, and soy are the most likely foods that cause an immunologic reaction in childhood, many of which persist into adulthood.

Will altering maternal diet when pregnant prevent or delay atopic disease in children?

Here is what the American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended In the past.

Pregnant women avoid allergenic foods in their diet such as peanuts, eggs, and cows milk. However, recent evidence has NOT felt that dietary manipulations or restrictions make any difference. A large Cochrane review study done in 2006, involving 334 women, concluded that avoidance diets during pregnancy are UNLIKELY to substantially affect the child’s risk of atopic disease. In fact, such diets might adversely effect maternal or fetal nutrition which can cause lower gestational weight gain, slightly higher risk of preterm birth, and a reduction in birthweight of the infants. However, future trials with a larger sample size were recommended.

Similarly…

Another researcher, Muraro in 2004 after reviewing all the literature concluded that there is NO evidence that maternal diet during pregnancy or lactation prevents the development of atopic disease.

However, a study concludes…

A recent study by Soutter at the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology in 2010, involving 274 high risk pregnant women, each with a previous documented child with food allergies, showed that children whose mothers avoided certain allergenic foods during late pregnancy and lactation had a lower chance of developing asthma and allergic sensitization when avoiding peanuts, tree nuts, milk and eggs when examined at 18 months and 3 years of age.

By age 3, there was no significant difference between the groups for eczema symptoms and dust mite sensitization but the differences in rates of peanut and egg sensitization as well as asthma was large and significant. It is felt that avoidance behavior may work for certain people and not for others.

Does breastfeeding effect the development of atopic disease?

There is some evidence that breastfeeding in the first 3 to 4 months of life is associated with a reduced risk of developing allergic disease in early childhood, especially eczema during infancy and childhood asthma and wheezing.

As far as food allergy, breastfeeding for at least 4 months had a lower incidence of cow milk allergy in some studies but in others there was no difference. A Cochrane review from 2006 found that feeding an infant with a hydrolyzed formula compared to cows milk formula did reduce the the development of infant and childhood allergy.

There is no evidence that breastfeeding for greater than 6 months has any protective effect against allergic disease. The studies are controversial and mostly retrospective. Long term effects of breastfeeding on the development of allergy in later life is uncertain.

Why is the peanut allergy so common?

There are many theories as to why there is a rising prevalence in peanut allergies in western countries.

Peanuts are a staple of the American diet and is being used more commonly in “quick energy foods.” Considered excellent nutritionally due to its high protein content it is being ingested more frequently in pregnant and breastfeeding women (One peanut contains 200 mg protein). Peanut protein can be found in breast milk and in utero 1 to 3 hours after ingestion.

Most American children are exposed to peanut butter in their first year of life in contrast to other countries. Americans eat dry-roasted peanuts requiring higher temperatures, which increase the allergenicity. Other countries eat peanuts that are boiled or fried.

Even though the European guidelines and the American Academy of Pediatrics do not recommend avoidance of dietary allergens during pregnancy, the avoidance of peanuts during pregnancy might be an exception for families with a history of peanut allergy.

In summary:

At this time, current evidence does not support a role for dietary restrictions during pregnancy or lactation to prevent allergic disease. It is felt that more studies are needed.

For high risk infants with a strong family history of allergy, there is evidence that exclusive breastfeeding for at least 4 months compared with cow milk formula, decreased or delayed the risk of eczema, cow milk allergy and wheezing in the first 2 years of life.

For infants that are not breast fed but who are at high risk for allergy, there is some evidence that the use of hydrolyzed formula, compared to cows milk, helps prevent or delay allergic disease. Soy formulas are not recommended to prevent allergy.

Peanuts are the one exception where avoidance during pregnancy and breastfeeding may decrease the risk of subsequent peanut allergy.

Should You Eat or Drink During Labor?

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

eating in laborPrior to the mid-1940’s, women had been allowed to eat during labor. Then, a 1946 study showed that women who ate during labor had a higher chance of aspiration, (involuntary inhalation of stomach contents during anesthesia.) After the publication of the study by Curtis Mendelson, women were strongly advised that they should stop eating as soon as they felt contractions or thought that they were in labor.

Do women need to fast during labor?

Since this 1946 study, standard conventional obstetrical practice in the United States has adhered to the belief that women in labor should restrict the amount of oral and fluid intake. These concerns have been based on the presumption that potentially fatal aspiration of stomach contents, or asphyxiation, from large food particles could occur if an emergency cesarean section was warranted under general anesthesia. Recent studies in the obstetrical literature have re-evaluated this position and questioned the evidence to support this practice.

What are the actual risks of aspiration in labor?

The actual incidence of aspiration during birth is 7 per 10 million births in cases accumulated between 1979 and 1990 in the United States. A study in which 11,814 women were allowed to eat and drink during labor reported no maternal damage or death occurring from aspiration. There have been no maternal mortalities due to aspiration in Australia since 1987 and only one death in the UK in the 1990’s despite a recent liberalization of oral intake policy.

What are the reasons that women in labor are more at risk to aspirate?

Pregnancy causes slowed gastric motility or action. Gastric emptying is further delayed in labor due to the use of narcotic analgesics that can predispose women to aspirate abdominal contents. In addition, the acidic nature of the stomach content can cause bronchospasm and congestion which can result in pulmonary edema and death. Certain high-risk conditions make a person more prone to aspiration, such as obesity, small airways and patients with a history of gastroesophageal reflux. Also, poor anesthesia technique can contribute to aspiration, such as blowing air into the stomach and anesthesia that is too light which may cause bucking and coughing with a full stomach and then, essentially, aspiration of the regurgitated stomach content.

What is the common philosophy that hospitals use to avoid aspiration in labor?

Intravenous hydration with Ringers lactate has been the mainstay of fluid and nutritional replacement during labor, with the occasional use of ice chips.

What are the problems associated with intravenous hydration?

Energy requirements are increased during labor, similar to an athlete doing strenuous exercise requiring increased caloric expenditure. Exclusive intravenous therapy may not be sufficient to meet these requirements. Long labors without eating can cause a woman to metabolize fats instead of carbohydrates, which can lead to a buildup of ketones which has been associated with prolonged labors.

Large infusions of glucose solutions can lead to elevated blood sugar levels in the infant, while after birth this is followed by low glucose levels, jaundice, low ph, electrolyte problems and rapid breathing. Lower dose 5% glucose solutions have been associated with greater weight loss in the infant after the first 2 days of birth. In addition, women may be more prone to fluid overload, immobilization, and increased stress when only IV fluids are used.

Does restriction of oral intake actually prevent aspiration pneumonia?

The restriction of oral intake and reduction of the volume of contents in the stomach prior to Cesarean section has not eliminated the reported very rare risk of aspiration. Fasting women in labor have been found to have gastric contents with more concentrated acidic content which may increase the maternal morbidity and mortality.

What can be done to eliminate the risk of aspiration in labor?

Proper anesthetic precautions should always be followed, such as avoidance of unnecessary Cesarean sections, preferential use of spinal or epidural anesthesia and protection of the airway when general anesthesia is used. Additionally, the use of medications to prevent or neutralize acid secretion in the stomach from reaching the lungs has been one of the most effective means of preventing this complication. In addition, some anesthesiologists use medications to enhance gastric emptying.

  • It may be best to avoid intake of solids during labor.
  • It may be best to consume only clear liquids, isotonic drinks and light meals, which will not increase intragastric volume and may be well tolerated.
  • Women who have a high risk of Cesarean section can be further restricted in their oral intake.


What are some of the official guidelines for women to follow in labor?

The World Health Organization states that women need increased energy for the requirements of labor and a woman’s desire for food and liquid should not interfere with the natural process of labor and will ensure both fetal and maternal well-being. This philosophy is echoed by the WHO-Euro as well as the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada for women in normally progressing labors.

In Summary

The pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in labor is not a major problem in today’s obstetrical world. More evidence is now available pointing to the safety of light liquid and food regimens during labor in women who are in the low-risk population.

High-risk woman, who are more likely to need a Cesarean section should probably avoid solid foods. Anesthesiologists should administer appropriate antacids and other stomach neutralizers. They should also provide agents to promote gastric emptying before surgical procedures, with protection of the airway, should general anesthesia be required.

Strung Out On Caffeine During Pregnancy?

Monday, February 15th, 2010

A Stimulating Summary of the Latest Research

High test or decaf?

There is no question that many of us love our morning cups of coffee, or tea. Caffeine wakes us from our slumber and helps us become alert for the challenging day ahead. The true question, which is very important for a pregnant woman to understand is why, and how, caffeine affects the mother’s body—and the subsequent influence of that cup of coffee, tea or hot chocolate on her unborn child.

Products that contain caffeine, such as coffee, tea, and chocolate are amongst the most popular and widespread products consumed in the world and its usage may date as far back as 3000 BC, in China. While caffeine is known to be a natural pesticide that paralyzes and kills insects feeding on certain plants, its sustained popularity stems from several unique physiologic and pharmacologic properties. In other words, caffeine contains chemicals that have a profound stimulating influence on the nervous system, as well as many other human bodily functions.

Caffeine’s stimulant properties may:

  • affect the central nervous system leading to increased alertness and arousal.
  • cause an increased heart rate.
  • have a diuretic effect that may lead to increased urination.
  • affect the muscular system positively through increased coordination and ability to perform physical labor but may also affect the muscular system negatively in higher doses, as it can lead to tremors.
  • have mental effects which can increase short term memory but decrease long term memory.
  • increase the effectiveness of other drugs, such as headache medications, and can help overcome drowsiness from antihistamines.

 
What happens to the baby when a product containing caffeine is consumed?

Caffeine is absorbed by the stomach and small intestine within 45 minutes of ingestion. It crosses readily to the placenta, accumulating in both the fetus and amniotic fluid. It is metabolized three times more slowly in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women, allowing for greater, and longer lasting, accumulation in the fetus.

Caffeine also significantly decreases blood flow in the placental villi, (small projections which help increase absorption of nutrients) through constriction of the vessels. Keep in mind that the fetus gets everything it needs from blood flow including nutrition, oxygenation, etc. and, if these vessels become constricted, the fetus gets less of everything needed for growth and development. Consequently, it is thought that maybe this constriction can possibly lead to reduced growth and can be associated with impaired development later on in life—or even stillbirth.

Considering the quantity of caffeine consumed, knowing whether caffeine is harmful in pregnancy is a major public health concern. Many studies have been written about the safety of caffeine in pregnancy most concluding that no malformations have been attributed to caffeine consumption and that most scientists believe that caffeine is not a teratogen (an agent or factor that causes malformations in an embryo) in humans.

However, concerns regarding harmful effects have stemmed from animal and human studies that have shown decreased intrauterine fetal growth, lower birth weights (less than 2500 grams), and skeletal abnormalities. (Vlajinac,1997;Caan, 1989). Other studies have shown no association between caffeine use and adverse outcomes in pregnancy. (Linn, 1982;Bech 2007, Clausson, 2000) Results of these kinds of studies are always questionable because many have been retrospective studies; those being studies that depend upon patient recollection, vary in the amounts of caffeine consumed, have differing sources of caffeine (coffee, tea, chocolate, medication), and have different methods of preparation and serving sizes.

Other studies have correlated specific quantities of caffeine consumed as being the determining factor of risk. (Fenster,1991)

It is known, however, that caffeine is readily transferred into human milk and therefore breast feeding mothers, who consume caffeine, may cause stimulatory effects in younger children.

In 1980, the United States Food and Drug Administration advised pregnant women to avoid caffeine containing foods and drugs, or use them sparingly.

The UK Food Standards Agency has recommended that women limit caffeine intake to under 200 mg of caffeine per day, which is equivalent to 2 cups of instant of coffee.

In Summary:

Most recent studies conclude that caffeine intake during pregnancy does not impose a major public health issue with regard to fetal health. However, because of the controversy that exists with the use of caffeine and impaired fetal growth in pregnancy, it is probably advisable to reduce the intake of caffeine during pregnancy to under 300 mg/day (3 cups of coffee) and encourage drinking decaffeinated coffee as a substitute.

Estimates of caffeine intake that might be helpful for pregnant women: (150 ml portion)

Coffee Tea Soft Drinks Cocoa
Brewed 115 mg Loose 39 mg 15 mg 4 mg
Boiled 90 mg Tea bags 39 mg    
Instant 60 mg Herbal 0 mg    

 
Dark roast has less caffeine compared to light roast because roasting reduces the caffeine content.

Tea generally contains more caffeine than coffee but is generally brewed much more weakly.

1 g of chocolate bar = 0.3 mg caffeine.

Most drugs contain 50–100 mg of caffeine per tablet.

Swine Flu: February Update on H1N1

Monday, February 8th, 2010

This is the latest information regarding the Swine Flu Pandemic.

  • Flu activity appears to be decreasing in the United States.
  • Pregnant women have an increased risk of severe disease.
  • Pregnant women with mild or moderate symptoms can have a rapid deterioration with progression of disease.
  • Pregnant women with other health related issues (ex. asthmatics) can have even further increased risk of flu related complications.
  • The overall maternal mortality in the United States for 2009 may be increased due to the high maternal mortality of H1N1.
  • Majority of hospitalized severely ill women infected with H1N1 were in the second or third trimester of pregnancy.
  • Rapid antiviral treatment, generally within 48 hours of presentation of symptoms, is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and all suspected cases for up to 2 weeks after delivery, according to the CDC.
  • Delays in treatment of greater than 48 hours had a four fold greater risk of ICU admission or even death.
  • Rapid tests for diagnoses of the disease have poor sensitivity and therefore should not be used to make clinical decisions on whether to start treatment.
  • Vaccination is critical in pregnant women and benefits not only the mother but also the newborn with decreased respiratory infections for 6 months after delivery.
  • Children shed virus longer than adults but whether this implies they are contagious longer is unknown.

(source NEJM Dec 2009)

They Put WHAT In That Stuff? More bad ingredients for breast feeding babies.

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

“They Put WHAT In That Stuff?”I developed my Beauté de Maman Nipple Gel because certain products on the market contain ingredients that may not be safe for breast feeding babies. If you are a breast feeding mom, please be wary of nipple gels and creams containing the following ingredients.

Please forward this to anyone that is pregnant or breast feeding. Click “Share” above.

Lanolin

If the nipple product contains lanolin, do not use. Please see our article below regarding pesticides, lanolin and breast feeding babies.

Read more about pesticides in lanolin-based products

Olive Oil

If the nipple product contains olive oil, we recommend you put it back on the store shelf. Why? Because Beauté de Maman did a trial of products containing olive oil prior to being released onto the market and found that the product crystallized and became rancid after 3 months, similar to olive oil that is used for cooking. We therefore opted to use a different omega 3 fatty acid — one that is healthy for newborns and maintains shelf-life for a much longer period of time.

Marshmallow Root

There is no data on the safety of marshmallow root and therefore this ingredient should not be used for infant ingestion until clear safety data is available.

Beeswax

There is also no data on the safety of beeswax and therefore this ingredient should not be used for infant ingestion until clear safety data is available. Beeswax comes from honeycombs which is found in candles. Furthermore, honeycombs are where bees produce and store their honey. Honey may contain spores that contain botulism. Pediatricians warn new parents to never give honey to an infant under one year of age. Beeswax may still contain honey particles and therefore I would not recommend using a nipple gel product containing beeswax.

Shea Butter

Shea butter is a cholesterol compound similar to cocoa butter. It is considered a saturated fatty acid which most individuals are trying hard to eliminate in their diets as recommended by the National Institute of Health. Beauté de Maman uses a monounsaturated fatty acid base, which is a much healthier alternative for the newborn infant.

Consumers be wary: Watch for companies that make blanket statements regarding ingredients that are not factually based. Many of the sources used by these companies are from cosmetic databases derived from online retailers solely written to lure consumers. Only use products researched on databases that pull safety data from evidence based medical research studies.

Beauté de Maman Nipple Gel contains only safe ingredients that have been researched by a board certified obstetrician from unbiased scientific literature from the Reproduction Toxicity Database.

This is an information system that lists environmental hazards to human reproduction and development. It also contains summaries regarding the specific effects of medications, chemicals, infections, and physical agents on pregnancy. It is used by clinicians, scientists, and government agencies to make decisions regarding the safety of products in the US. We are proud of our record regarding infant safety.

The reproduction toxicity database provides information that we, at the Beauté de Maman laboratories, rely upon for safety standards.

About the Vitamin E in Beauté de Maman Nipple Gel

Toxicity has a great deal to do with purity and dosages.

All Beauté de Maman ingredients are pure and well within the acceptable dosages for pregnant and lactating women.

The recommended daily allowance (RDA) for vitamin E is 15 mg/d during pregnancy and 19 mg/d during lactation. The recommended upper limit is 800 mg/d for pregnant and lactating women under 18 years old. The recommended upper limit is 1000 mg/d for pregnant and lactating older women. Beauté de Maman Nipple Gel contains 1% of purified vitamin E. The most a baby ingests from our product line is 1 gram of nipple gel a day, or about 10 mg/d of Vitamin E per day—well within the normal range. Therefore, the amount and purity of Vitamin E in Beauté de Maman is safe in pregnancy.

Back by popular demand!

Below is a reprint of our previous article on lanolin and pesticides.

As you may know, most breast feeding women are sent home from the hospital, after giving birth, with a lanolin-based product to help relieve their sore, chapped nipples. As a physician and OBGYN, I am very concerned about this and want to send you this warning about lanolin-based products.

The first thing you need to know is that pesticides have not one, BUT TWO, ways of getting into lanolin-based nipple gels and creams. It all begins with sheep, as lanolin comes from the sebaceous glands of these animals.

Lanolin is an animal based product, 100% cholesterol, and is taken from sheep that graze on grass that is treated…

Read more about pesticides in lanolin-based products

Or, Go Shopping for Beauté de Maman Nipple Gel

Please forward this to anyone that is pregnant or breast feeding.

And be sure to check out all our pregnancy-safe health products…

Pregnant Women: Beware of Soft Cheeses and Undercooked Meats

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Brie_WebPregnancy, due to suppression in the immune system, can make a woman more susceptible to certain bacterial infections. Among the more serious infections is listeriosis, caused by the bacteria Listeria monocytogenes. This organism is a common colonizer of the gastrointestinal tract. It originates in the environment commonly found in soil, dust, water, produce, processed foods, and the feces of domestic and wild animals and humans. Invasive disease is rare but pregnant women have a 17 fold increased incidence compared to non-pregnant women.

What is the importance of listeria infections in pregnancy?

Listeria can be the cause of spontaneous abortions, premature labor, stillbirths, and infants with sepsis or meningitis. The newborn mortality rate from this disease is between 30 and 63%. The fetus gets infected either through the placenta via the maternal bloodstream, or ascending from the vaginal canal after having been infected from the gastrointestinal tract.

What is the incidence of listeriosis?

The general population has an incidence of invasive disease of 0.7 per 100,000 but pregnancyRawMeat_Web increases the incidence to 12 per 100,000. CDC has estimated approximately 2,500 cases per year in the U.S. resulting in approximately 500 deaths. About a third of the cases of listeria occur in pregnant women. The bacteria can be found as a colonizer in the feces of 70% of healthy people and 44% of pregnant women. It is rarely found in the vagina. Although colonization is common, invasive disease is unusual.

Pregnant women that are immunocompromised with HIV infections, diabetes, steroid use, and splenectomy are especially susceptible to this pathogen.

How do pregnant women get infected with Listeria?

Food contaminated with the bacteria is the main source of infection. Main reservoirs include soft cheeses (feta, brie, camembert), blue veined cheeses, Mexican-style cheese (queso blanco), coleslaw, pâté, pork tongue, unpasteurized milk, foods prepared from raw milk, turkey franks, and delicatessen foods. Listeria has the capacity to multiply at refrigerator temperatures (4–10 degree C) and therefore can contaminate undercooked meat and vegetables. All surfaces and utensils must be washed carefully when exposed to uncooked meats.

What are the symptoms of infection in the mother and the newborn?

Most pregnant women are asymptomatic or present with a flu like illness with low grade fever, myalgia, headache, abdominal cramping or diarrhea. Rarely are the symptoms serious. Miscarriage or premature labor can occur 50% of the time with fetal distress 35% and meconium stained amniotic fluid 75% of the time. Occasionally a macular/papular rash can be present on the trunk and extremities. The placenta can also have evidence of micro-abscesses.

Onset of the disease in newborns is generally within 1–2 days of birth and appears as sepsis or pneumonia. There is also a late onset version of the disease in newborns that can occur 7–14 days after delivery and presents as meningitis.

A rare finding in infants is called granulomatous infantiseptica which is characterized by multiple widespread abscesses and granulomas.

The later in gestation that the disease occurs, the worse the outcome for the mother and the fetus.

Diagnoses is generally made with positive blood cultures. Organisms can also be found in the placenta or amniotic fluid. It can be isolated from urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and the oropharynx in infants.

What is the treatment for Listeria in pregnancy?

Treatment of choice for listeriosis is ampicillin, amoxicillin, or penicillin. For patients allergic to penicillin, treatment with erythromycin or vancomycin is recommended. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is another alternative for penicillin allergic patients but it is not recommended in the first trimester due to the anti-folate activity which can possibly lead to a neural tube defect. In utero therapy has been successful in several case reports averting the need for prompt delivery which is recommended in most other cases of chorioamnionitis.

Ampicillin along with an aminoglycoside is the management for newborn listeriosis. Length of treatment is controversial and some reports feel 3 to 4 weeks of high dose therapy is essential.

In summary, the key to prevention of listeria in pregnancy is avoidance of food products that may be contaminated with this bacteria. The FDA and CDC regularly monitors any reports of contamination but it is always best to avoid high risk foods. In addition, food should be stored, handled, and cooked properly to reduce the risk of acquiring this infection.

A Thanksgiving Wish and Warning

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Dear friends, patients and customers… pregnant or not.

Due to the holidays, I will not be posting my normal pregnancy blog this week. However, for those of you who are pregnant, I felt it important to give you a quick heads up before your food festivities begin Thursday.

Feel free to enjoy the turkey, stuffing, fruits, vegetables and pumpkin pie to your hearts content, but you may want to refrain from eating Brie and other soft cheeses, or any form of undercooked meats until you give birth. Please advise all your pregnant friends and family members as well.

I will explain all this in detail next week when I will be posting my article regarding soft cheeses and undercooked meats… and the potential negative impact on your pregnancy.
.
Until then, from all of us at Beaute de Maman, we wish you a very happy, and a very healthy, Thanksgiving.

Best Regards,
Dr. Michele Brown
OBGYN and Founder of Beaute de Maman

Warning: Certain Antibiotics May Be Associated With Birth Defects

Monday, November 16th, 2009

PillswebOne of the most popular classifications of medications used throughout pregnancy are antibiotics. Many of the common drugs used by pregnant women such as penicillins, erythromycins, and cephalosporins have been considered safe with minimal risk of birth defects. However, with the creation of more resistant bacteria and the development of newer drug classifications, more choices have recently become available with less data and safety information available for use in pregnancy.

A recent study published by Crider, from the CDC’s National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, published in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, November issue, discussed the association of birth defects found in pregnant women taking antibiotics anytime from one month before conception through the end of the first trimester.

The study involved 3,863 case mothers and 1,467 controls in a retrospective analysis that showed associations between exposure to certain antibiotics and birth defect outcomes. It did not attribute any causal relationship. In addition, the study was done by telephone interview approximately 6 weeks to 2 years after the pregnancy which could result in an inaccurate recall of medications.

Results showed confirmation of safety profiles for the commonly used penicillins, erythromycins, and cephalosporins. However, several other antibiotics commonly used in pregnancy to treat urinary tract infections, such as sulfonamides and nitrofurantoins, were associated with several birth defects. Among the defects for the nitrofurantoins (Macrobid) were anophthalmia or microphthalmos, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, atrial septa1 defects, and cleft lip with cleft palate. Associations with sulfonamides (Bactrim and Septra) were more numerous and included anencephaly, left sided heart defects, coarctation of the aorta, choanal atresia, transverse limb deficiency, and diaphragmatic hernia.

In conclusion, more data is needed to further analyze these associations of potential adverse effects on the fetus with the use of these medications. In the meantime it is always prudent to use the commonly prescribed medications as first line therapy where possible negative effects are almost nonexistent.

Pregnancy Precautions: Swine Flu to Peak Earlier Than Expected.

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

Public health officials have now predicted that the peak outbreak for the swine flu will be in late October rather than the usual peak for most cases of flu, which is in January or February. Unfortunately vaccination supplies will not be available till mid October. In addition, immunity occurs 8 to 10 days after vaccination. This would imply that the majority of people would not be sufficiently protected by the time the outbreak occurs. It is estimated that there are 159 million high-risk people, 4 million of which are pregnant.

Pregnant women are at increased risk of complications from infection with swine flu making them one of the highest priority groups to be vaccinated. If the virus should peak one month later, it would make a tremendous difference in morbidity and mortality worldwide.

From April 15th to May 18th 2009, there were 34 confirmed cases of swine flu in pregnancy. Of those, 32% were admitted to the hospital. This is higher rate of admission than the general population. There were 6 deaths reported. All the women had died of pneumonia and eventually acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring artificial ventilation.

The other recent new finding is that one dose of vaccine appears to provide sufficient immunity to the virus rather than having to administer 2 doses, as originally reported.

Patient trials on a few hundred people have shown the vaccination to be highly effective and safe with no deaths or dangerous side effects reported so far. The major side effects have been limited to sore arms and headaches.

Vaccination for the regular flu and the swine flu can be given at the same time as long as it is an injected killed virus and administered in two separate anatomic locations.

The current recommendation for pregnant woman to avoid getting infected is good hand washing, avoidance of infected individuals, and prompt treatment with anti-influenza medications after exposure or early infection with the virus.

Glucose Test in Pregnancy can Predict Future Heart Disease

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009
It has been well known that glucose abnormalities in pregnancy are predictive of a greater risk of diabetes later in life. However, a recent study in the Canadian Medical Association Journal by Retnakaran and Shah has now shown that mild glucose abnormalities in pregnancy, even if not diagnostic of gestational diabetes, can also predict an increase in the risk of heart disease later in life. Heart disease is the number one killer of women in the United States.
The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends that glucose screening be performed in all pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy using a 50 gram glucose challenge test. If results are abnormal, a 3 hour oral glucose tolerance test using 100 grams of glucose follows with the results determining which women are diabetic and which are not. Diabetic pregnant women are considered higher risk pregnancies and are closely monitored with finger stick glucose results for the remainder of the pregnancy with medications added as needed. Most commonly the diabetes disappears at delivery and many of these women are lost to follow-up care. This new study is critical in the conclusion that those women with glucose abnormalities, no matter how slight, should be followed for cardiovascular disease for the remainder of their lives.
The study was retrospective and included all women between the ages of 20&#8211;49 in Ontario, Canada who delivered between 1994 to 1998 and did not have a preexisting diagnoses of diabetes. Women were followed for 12.3 years after delivery. The results showed greatest risk in women with gestational diabetes, 4.2 vs 2.3, in women who failed the 1 hour but passed the 3 hour test, and 1.9 rate per 10,000 person-years in women who passed both tests. This demonstrated that women with even mild glucose abnormalities had an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease compared to the normal population but not as great as the gestational diabetics who clearly had higher vascular mortality.
The authors also suggest that the diabetes does not occur prior to the heart disease but rather that the two develop in parallel. There may be some damage to the vascular system that is not clinically apparent by the time the diabetes testing is positive. Correcting the sugar levels in diabetic patients fails to reduce the mortality or change the cardiovascular risk rates adding credence to the fact that the vascular damage has occurred prior to the high blood sugar levels. Still, controlling the sugar levels in the early stages of pregnancy is important to prevent congenital malformations and also to prevent excessive growth of the fetus. It is also important in the mother to allow for proper wound healing and the prevention of infections. In addition, women who had borderline glucose abnormalities and those who were diabetic were more obese than normoglycemic women and perhaps it is the obesity causing the hyperglycemia, which can cause an increase in cardiovascular risk.
In conclusion, continued surveillance after delivery in all women who had any glucose abnormalities during their pregnancy is essential. Special emphasis on modifications of other risk factors (obesity, smoking, hypertension, cholesterol) in this population may have a beneficial effect on future prevention of heart disease in this new high risk group.

stop+heart+diseaseIt has been well known that glucose abnormalities in pregnancy are predictive of a greater risk of diabetes later in life. However, a recent study in the Canadian Medical Association Journal by Retnakaran and Shah has now shown that mild glucose abnormalities in pregnancy, even if not diagnostic of gestational diabetes, can also predict an increase in the risk of heart disease later in life. Heart disease is the number one killer of women in the United States.

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends that glucose screening be performed in all pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy using a 50 gram glucose challenge test. If results are abnormal, a 3 hour oral glucose tolerance test using 100 grams of glucose follows with the results determining which women are diabetic and which are not. Diabetic pregnant women are considered higher risk pregnancies and are closely monitored with finger stick glucose results for the remainder of the pregnancy with medications added as needed. Most commonly the diabetes disappears at delivery and many of these women are lost to follow-up care. This new study is critical in the conclusion that those women with glucose abnormalities, no matter how slight, should be followed for cardiovascular disease for the remainder of their lives.

The study was retrospective and included all women between the ages of 20 – 49 in Ontario, Canada who delivered between 1994 to 1998 and did not have a preexisting diagnoses of diabetes. Women were followed for 12.3 years after delivery. The results showed greatest risk in women with gestational diabetes, 4.2 vs 2.3, in women who failed the 1 hour but passed the 3 hour test, and 1.9 rate per 10,000 person-years in women who passed both tests. This demonstrated that women with even mild glucose abnormalities had an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease compared to the normal population but not as great as the gestational diabetics who clearly had higher vascular mortality.

The authors also suggest that the diabetes does not occur prior to the heart disease but rather that the two develop in parallel. There may be some damage to the vascular system that is not clinically apparent by the time the diabetes testing is positive. Correcting the sugar levels in diabetic patients fails to reduce the mortality or change the cardiovascular risk rates adding credence to the fact that the vascular damage has occurred prior to the high blood sugar levels. Still, controlling the sugar levels in the early stages of pregnancy is important to prevent congenital malformations and also to prevent excessive growth of the fetus. It is also important in the mother to allow for proper wound healing and the prevention of infections. In addition, women who had borderline glucose abnormalities and those who were diabetic were more obese than normoglycemic women and perhaps it is the obesity causing the hyperglycemia, which can cause an increase in cardiovascular risk.

In conclusion, continued surveillance after delivery in all women who had any glucose abnormalities during their pregnancy is essential. Special emphasis on modifications of other risk factors (obesity, smoking, hypertension, cholesterol) in this population may have a beneficial effect on future prevention of heart disease in this new high risk group.

Beaute de Maman on sale at CVS.com for 20% off this weekend August 27- August 30th!

Friday, August 28th, 2009

aut6q2vrd5

Use of Ginger in the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy

Monday, August 10th, 2009
Ground Ginger as used in Beauté de Maman Dietary Supplement for Nausea in Pregancy

Ground Ginger as used in Beauté de Maman Dietary Supplement for Nausea in Pregancy

Gingerbread_House

Ginger Bread House. Everyone knows how good Ginger Bread tastes but did you know that GINGER helps alleviate Morning Sickness?

Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is a nutritive, herbal supplement considered safe by the Food and Drug Administration. It has been used for thousands of years in many countries such as Rome, Greece, India, and Arabia for digestive disorders. It is listed in the pharmacopoeias of the United Kingdom, Thailand, and China as effective treatment for
nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.

The components of ginger are gingetol and shogaol appear to have only local effects on the gastrointestinal system in comparison to prescription anti-nausea medications which effect the central nervous system.

Beaute de Maman Morning Sickness Supplement

Nausea complicating pregnancy occurs in over 80% of women and therefore finding a natural, herbal remedy as first line therapy that health care providers can offer safely is highly desirable. Many articles are now being published that point to the safety and effectiveness of ginger in pregnancy. (more…)

Fish Consumption in Pregnancy—Is It Good Or Bad?

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

Tuna swimming in the sea.

Much confusion exists between the health benefits of eating fish during pregnancy versus the contamination acquired from toxins found in fish. So, what recommendations should we give to pregnant women?

The Benefits:

Eating fish during pregnancy is due to the presence of omega 3 fatty acids EPA and DHA.

These compounds have been shown to: (more…)

Tattoos and piercing during pregnancy

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Body art in the form of tattoos and piercing are becoming more popular in the general population. Roughly 13% of the U.S. population has a tattoo and 45 to 50% of college students have a piercing.

tattoo on woman

Tattoo and body piercing on woman.

Tattooing is equally common in both sexes but body piercing is more common among females. (more…)

Should pregnant women use seat belts?

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Many pregnant women have  concerns about using seat belts  when driving because of fears that  the constraint might be more harmful to the baby during an accident. However, new research has shown that seat belts and airbags reduce the risk of trauma, fetal loss, and early delivery caused by motor vehicle accidents.
(more…)

How Does Air Flight Affect Pregnant Women?

Monday, June 15th, 2009

With summer vacations approaching, holiday air travel is common. Pregnant women often question the safety of air travel.
(more…)

Exercise and Preconception

Sunday, June 14th, 2009

FERTILITY MAGAZINE • VOLUME 10 • WWW.FERTMAG.COM

by Michele Brown, MD, FACOG and Kristi Cristello, BS, MEd

Joseph Pilates, creator of the popular fitness program, said “Physical fitness is the first prerequisite of happiness.” The same can be said for pregnancy A healthy well nourished and fit body and a sound mind are best prepared to tackle the stresses of pregnancy. Preparing your body for pregnancy will not only it increase your odds of becoming pregnant, it will also promote a healthy and enjoyable pregnancy and a favorable outcome.
(more…)

Swimming Pools and Saunas—Are They Safe in Pregnancy?

Monday, June 8th, 2009

With the summer months approaching, pregnant women are concerned about the risks to themselves and their baby in swimming pools and saunas. There is no question that the risk of bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections can increase during this time.
(more…)

Artificial sweeteners in pregnancy — Are they safe?

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Artificial sweeteners are food additives that are used as sugar substitutes. They are used in over 1500 food products such as soft drinks, candy, and desserts. Pregnant women, in an effort to avoid sugar, often turn to these sweeteners. The fact that they are so ubiquitous makes the question of their safety to mother and baby all the more relevant.
(more…)

Circumcision — The Cutting Edge

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

The debate over circumcision is centuries old. Worldwide, about 25% of males undergo this procedure. In the United States, over 60% of males are circumcised. New evidence has recently emerged that brings forth additional benefits of this procedure, making it more appealing to new parents.
(more…)

Risk of Leukemia Increases with Exposure to Formaldehyde

Friday, May 15th, 2009

News Alert!

Recent data just published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute has shown that exposure to formaldehyde can increase risks of blood and lymphatic cancers, in particular myeloid leukemia.
Approximately 25,000 workers followed from 1979 to 1994 exposed to formaldehyde working in industrial plants had a 37% increase risk of death from these cancers. The mechanism of how formaldehyde can cause leukemia is unknown but most likely involves chromosomal changes on blood cells.
(more…)

Breast Feeding Can Reduce the Risk of Heart Disease

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

It has been well known that breast feeding has significant health benefits to the baby. Recently it has been found to afford benefits to the mother as well. This short review will summarize the existing information and present some of the new studies.
(more…)

Have a happy, healthy and Beauté de Maman pregnancy.

Saturday, May 2nd, 2009

Being an obstetrician, I have the greatest job in the world. Pregnancy and delivery is undoubtedly one of the supreme highlights in a woman’s life and I have the distinct pleasure of being able to share this moment with my patients on a daily basis.
(more…)